Celeron B810
VS
Celeron 2957U

Celeron B810 vs Celeron 2957U

Intel

Celeron B810

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron 2957U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron B810 is positioned at rank 801 and the Celeron 2957U is on rank 53, so the Celeron 2957U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B810

#789
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1207%
#790
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1189%
#791
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1092%
#792
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1087%
#793
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1077%
#795
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1040%
#796
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
997%
#797
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
995%
#798
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
969%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
100%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
98%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#812
Athlon II Neo K345
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2957U

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
96%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#41
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
212%
#42
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
209%
#43
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
192%
#44
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
191%
#45
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
189%
#47
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
183%
#48
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
175%
#49
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
175%
#50
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
170%
#53
Celeron 2957U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#65
Core i5-3320M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#66
Core i7-4510U
MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron B810 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 2957U in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron B810Celeron 2957U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($86)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron B810Celeron 2957U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($86)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron B810 and Celeron 2957U

Intel

Celeron B810

The Celeron B810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,091 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Celeron 2957U

The Celeron 2957U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B810 and Celeron 2957U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B810 versus 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 2957U — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Celeron B810 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Celeron B810 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 2957U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B810 scores 2,091 against the Celeron 2957U's 2,077 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron B810. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B810 vs 2 MB on the Celeron 2957U.

FeatureCeleron B810Celeron 2957U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz+14%
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz+14%
1.4 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,091
2,077
Geekbench 6 Single
284
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B810 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 2957U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron B810) vs 10 (Celeron 2957U) — the Celeron B810 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B810) and Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 2957U).

FeatureCeleron B810Celeron 2957U
Socket
PGA988
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+60%
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B810) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron 2957U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B810 targets Budget, Celeron 2957U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B810 rivals Pentium 967; Celeron 2957U rivals Pentium 2117U.

FeatureCeleron B810Celeron 2957U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Budget