Celeron B810 vs Core i5-3337U

CPU

GPU

Celeron B810

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-3337U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2013

Buy on Amazon

Celeron B810 vs Core i5-3337U Performance Spectrum

Celeron B810

2 / 2

2,091

0.0%

2,093

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B810 vs Core i5-3337U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B810 vs Core i5-3337U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B810

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $139 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 161.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 9.3 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,091 vs 2,093).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Core i5-3337U

2013

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 24.3 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3337U better than Celeron B810?

Yes. Core i5-3337U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-3337U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3337U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3337U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-3337U comes in 161.6% more expensive on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron B810 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 161.4% better value on paper (24.3 vs 9.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3337U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011), 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron B810 vs Core i5-3337U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B810

The Celeron B810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,091 points. Launch price was $86.

Core i5-3337U

The Core i5-3337U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron B810 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-3337U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B810 versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-3337U — a 51.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-3337U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Celeron B810 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-3337U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B810 scores 2,091 against the Core i5-3337U's 2,093 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-3337U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B810 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3337U.

Feature	Celeron B810	Core i5-3337U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.7 GHz+69%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,091	2,093

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B810 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3337U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B810 versus 1600 on the Core i5-3337U — the Core i5-3337U supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-3337U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B810) and HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3337U).

Feature	Celeron B810	Core i5-3337U
Socket	PGA988	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron B810) vs true (Core i5-3337U). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B810) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3337U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B810 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B810 rivals Pentium 967; Core i5-3337U rivals AMD A8-4555M.

Feature	Celeron B810	Core i5-3337U
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	true
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron B810 was priced at $86, while the Core i5-3337U came in at $225. On launch pricing ($86 vs $225), Celeron B810 was $139 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B810 delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 9.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-3337U — making the Celeron B810 the 89.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron B810	Core i5-3337U
MSRP	$86-62%	$225
Performance per Dollar	24.3+161%	9.3
Release Date	2011	2013

Search Celeron B810 on Amazon

Search Core i5-3337U on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.