3015Ce vs Celeron B810

CPU

GPU

3015Ce

2 Cores4 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2020

Celeron B810

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

3015Ce

2 / 4

2,099

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron B810

2 / 2

2,091

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The 3015Ce is positioned at rank 999 and the Celeron B810 is on rank 801, so the Celeron B810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar 3015Ce

#987

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

2097%

#988

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

2066%

#989

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1897%

#990

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1888%

#991

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1871%

#993

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1807%

#994

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1733%

#995

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1730%

#996

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1683%

#999

3015Ce

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

100%

#1000

Core i7-4700MQ

MSRP: $383|Avg: $50

100%

#1001

Athlon II M340

MSRP: $80|Avg: $15

100%

#1005

Pentium P6000

MSRP: $150|Avg: $90

98%

#1007

Core i7-3630QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

97%

#1008

Core i7-3610QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

97%

#1009

Core i3-1115GRE

MSRP: $338|Avg: $480

97%

#1010

Pentium A1020

MSRP: $86|Avg: $86

97%

#1011

Core i7-4702MQ

MSRP: $383|Avg: $50

97%

#1012

Pentium N4200

MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89

96%

#1013

Pentium J2900

MSRP: $94|Avg: $20

95%

#1014

Celeron T1700

MSRP: $80|Avg: $5

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B810

#789

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1207%

#790

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1189%

#791

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1092%

#792

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1087%

#793

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1077%

#795

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1040%

#796

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

997%

#797

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

995%

#798

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

969%

#801

Celeron B810

MSRP: $86|Avg: $86

100%

#803

Core i7-1365UE

MSRP: $429|Avg: $429

100%

#805

3020e

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

99%

#809

Athlon II M320

MSRP: $75|Avg: $15

98%

#810

Celeron B800

MSRP: $80|Avg: $5

98%

#811

Celeron B710

MSRP: $86|Avg: $10

98%

#812

Athlon II Neo K345

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The 3015Ce (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	3015Ce	Celeron B810
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($40)	⚠️ Higher cost ($86)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Pollock (Zen) (2020) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron B810 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	3015Ce	Celeron B810
Cost Efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+116%)	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($40)	⚠️ Higher cost ($86)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

3015Ce Benchmark Check

Celeron B810 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of 3015Ce and Celeron B810

3015Ce

The 3015Ce is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,099 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron B810

The Celeron B810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,091 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

The 3015Ce packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron B810's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015Ce versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B810 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the 3015Ce (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The 3015Ce uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron B810 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the 3015Ce scores 2,099 against the Celeron B810's 2,091 — a 0.4% lead for the 3015Ce. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015Ce vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B810.

Feature	3015Ce	Celeron B810
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+44%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	1.6 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Pollock (Zen) (2020)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	2,099	2,091

🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3015Ce uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron B810 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the 3015Ce versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B810 — the 3015Ce supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (3015Ce) vs 2 (Celeron B810). PCIe lanes: 8 (3015Ce) vs 16 (Celeron B810) — the Celeron B810 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP5 (3015Ce) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B810).

Feature	3015Ce	Celeron B810
Socket	FT5	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600+53233%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16	16 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (3015Ce) vs VT-x (Celeron B810). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (2-Core) (3015Ce) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B810) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B810 targets Budget. Direct competitor: 3015Ce rivals Celeron N4020; Celeron B810 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	3015Ce	Celeron B810
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics (2-Core)	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

The 3015Ce launched at $150 MSRP, while the Celeron B810 debuted at $86. At current prices ($40 vs $86), the 3015Ce is $46 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the 3015Ce delivers 52.5 pts/$ vs 24.3 pts/$ for the Celeron B810 — making the 3015Ce the 73.3% better value option.