3015Ce vs Athlon II X4 631

CPU

GPU

3015Ce

2 Cores4 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2020

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon II X4 631

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

3015Ce vs Athlon II X4 631 Performance Spectrum

3015Ce

2 / 4

2,099

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X4 631

4 / 4

2,118

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

3015Ce vs Athlon II X4 631 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

3015Ce vs Athlon II X4 631: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

3015Ce

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 100W, a 99W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2-Core), while Athlon II X4 631 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X4 631 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,099 vs 2,118).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 26.5 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Athlon II X4 631

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 89.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.5 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌9900% higher power demand at 100W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while 3015Ce can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X4 631 better than 3015Ce?

Yes. Athlon II X4 631 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X4 631 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 631 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X4 631 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X4 631 comes in $70 cheaper on MSRP at $80 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 89.2% better value on MSRP (26.5 vs 14.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

3015Ce makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

3015Ce vs Athlon II X4 631 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

3015Ce

The 3015Ce is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,099 points. Launch price was $50.

Athlon II X4 631

The Athlon II X4 631 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,118 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The 3015Ce packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X4 631 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 631 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015Ce versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 631 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 631 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The 3015Ce uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon II X4 631 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the 3015Ce scores 2,099 against the Athlon II X4 631's 2,118 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon II X4 631. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015Ce vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 631.

Feature	3015Ce	Athlon II X4 631
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.6 GHz+13%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+117%
L3 Cache	4 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Pollock (Zen) (2020)	Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark	2,099	2,118

🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3015Ce uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 631 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the 3015Ce versus DDR3-1866 on the Athlon II X4 631 — the Athlon II X4 631 supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X4 631 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (3015Ce) vs 2 (Athlon II X4 631). PCIe lanes: 8 (3015Ce) vs 16 (Athlon II X4 631) — the Athlon II X4 631 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP5 (3015Ce) and AMD FM1 (Athlon II X4 631).

Feature	3015Ce	Athlon II X4 631
Socket	FT5	FM1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR3-1866+17%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (3015Ce) / not specified (Athlon II X4 631). The 3015Ce includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (2-Core)), while the Athlon II X4 631 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: 3015Ce rivals Celeron N4020.

Feature	3015Ce	Athlon II X4 631
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics (2-Core)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the 3015Ce was priced at $150, while the Athlon II X4 631 came in at $80. On launch pricing ($150 vs $80), Athlon II X4 631 was $70 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the 3015Ce delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 26.5 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 631 — making the Athlon II X4 631 the 61.7% better value option.

Feature	3015Ce	Athlon II X4 631
MSRP	$150	$80-47%
Performance per Dollar	14.0	26.5+89%
Release Date	2020	2011

Search 3015Ce on Amazon

Search Athlon II X4 631 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.