CPU
GPU
3015Ce
Athlon II X4 631
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The 3015Ce is positioned at rank 999 and the Athlon II X4 631 is on rank 651, so the Athlon II X4 631 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar 3015Ce
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 631
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | 3015Ce | Athlon II X4 631 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Pollock (Zen) (2020) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | 3015Ce | Athlon II X4 631 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+169%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of 3015Ce and Athlon II X4 631
3015Ce
The 3015Ce is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,099 points. Launch price was $50.
Athlon II X4 631
The Athlon II X4 631 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,118 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The 3015Ce packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X4 631 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 631 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015Ce versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 631 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 631 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The 3015Ce uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon II X4 631 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the 3015Ce scores 2,099 against the Athlon II X4 631's 2,118 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon II X4 631. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015Ce vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 631.
| Feature | 3015Ce | Athlon II X4 631 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz+117% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Pollock (Zen) (2020) | Llano (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 2,099 | 2,118 |
Memory & Platform
The 3015Ce uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 631 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the 3015Ce versus DDR3-1866 on the Athlon II X4 631 — the 3015Ce supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X4 631 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (3015Ce) vs 2 (Athlon II X4 631). PCIe lanes: 8 (3015Ce) vs 16 (Athlon II X4 631) — the Athlon II X4 631 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP5 (3015Ce) and AMD FM1 (Athlon II X4 631).
| Feature | 3015Ce | Athlon II X4 631 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT5 | FM1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+53233% | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 64 GB+419430300% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (3015Ce) / not specified (Athlon II X4 631). The 3015Ce includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (2-Core)), while the Athlon II X4 631 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: 3015Ce rivals Celeron N4020.
| Feature | 3015Ce | Athlon II X4 631 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics (2-Core) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
The 3015Ce launched at $150 MSRP, while the Athlon II X4 631 debuted at $80. At current prices ($40 vs $15), the Athlon II X4 631 is $25 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the 3015Ce delivers 52.5 pts/$ vs 141.2 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 631 — making the Athlon II X4 631 the 91.6% better value option.
| Feature | 3015Ce | Athlon II X4 631 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $80-47% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $15-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.5 | 141.2+169% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on 3015Ce and Athlon II X4 631
