3015Ce vs Pentium G3260

AMD

3015Ce

2 Cores4 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G3260

2 Cores2 Thrd53 WW2015
Similar parts
·······

3015Ce vs Pentium G3260 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

3015Ce vs Pentium G3260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

3015Ce vs Pentium G3260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

3015Ce

2020

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Draws 1W instead of 53W, a 52W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2-Core), while Pentium G3260 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,099 vs 2,116).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 33.1 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).

Pentium G3260

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $86 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 136.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 33.1 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 5200% higher power demand at 53W vs 1W.
  • No integrated graphics, while 3015Ce can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G3260 better than 3015Ce?
Yes. Pentium G3260 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Pentium G3260 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G3260 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium G3260 is the better buy right now. Pentium G3260 comes in $86 cheaper on MSRP at $64 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 136.3% better value on MSRP (33.1 vs 14.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
3015Ce makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

3015Ce vs Pentium G3260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

3015Ce

The 3015Ce is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,099 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Pentium G3260

The Pentium G3260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,116 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The 3015Ce packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G3260's 2 cores. The 3015Ce is built on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. In PassMark, the 3015Ce scores 2,099 against the Pentium G3260's 2,116 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium G3260. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015Ce vs 3 MB on the Pentium G3260.

Feature3015CePentium G3260
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
3.3 GHz+175%
L3 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Pollock (Zen) (2020)
PassMark
2,099
2,116
🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3015Ce uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G3260 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature3015CePentium G3260
Socket
FT5
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (3015Ce) / not specified (Pentium G3260). The 3015Ce includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (2-Core)), while the Pentium G3260 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: 3015Ce rivals Celeron N4020.

Feature3015CePentium G3260
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics (2-Core)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the 3015Ce was priced at $150, while the Pentium G3260 came in at $64. On launch pricing ($150 vs $64), Pentium G3260 was $86 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the 3015Ce delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 33.1 pts/$ for the Pentium G3260 — making the Pentium G3260 the 81% better value option.

Feature3015CePentium G3260
MSRP
$150
$64-57%
Performance per Dollar
14.0
33.1+136%
Release Date
2020
2015

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.