3015Ce vs Xeon X3330

3015Ce vs Xeon X3330 Performance Spectrum

3015Ce

2 / 4

2,099

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X3330

2,102

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

3015Ce vs Xeon X3330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

3015Ce vs Xeon X3330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

3015Ce

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 95W, a 94W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2-Core), while Xeon X3330 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3330 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,099 vs 2,102).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon X3330 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X3330

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌9400% higher power demand at 95W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while 3015Ce can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X3330 better than 3015Ce?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3330 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while 3015Ce is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X3330 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X3330 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X3330 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon X3330 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. 3015Ce only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 7.8% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

3015Ce makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

3015Ce vs Xeon X3330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

3015Ce

The 3015Ce is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,099 points. Launch price was $50.

Xeon X3330

The Xeon X3330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,102 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The 3015Ce is built on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. In PassMark, the 3015Ce scores 2,099 against the Xeon X3330's 2,102 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon X3330. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015Ce vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3330.

Feature	3015Ce	Xeon X3330
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	—
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.66 GHz+122%
L3 Cache	4 MB	6 MB L2 Cache+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Pollock (Zen) (2020)	—
PassMark	2,099	2,102

🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3015Ce uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3330 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	3015Ce	Xeon X3330
Socket	FT5	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (3015Ce) / not specified (Xeon X3330). The 3015Ce includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (2-Core)), while the Xeon X3330 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: 3015Ce rivals Celeron N4020.