3015Ce vs Celeron N2807

CPU

GPU

3015Ce

2 Cores4 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2020

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron N2807

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.16 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

3015Ce vs Celeron N2807 Performance Spectrum

3015Ce

2 / 4

2,099

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N2807

2 / 2

2,093

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

3015Ce vs Celeron N2807 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

3015Ce vs Celeron N2807: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

3015Ce

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 4W, a 3W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N2807 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Celeron N2807

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $43 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 39.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.6 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,093 vs 2,099).
❌300% higher power demand at 4W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is 3015Ce better than Celeron N2807?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N2807 is ahead with a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, 3015Ce pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, 3015Ce is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

3015Ce is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. 3015Ce comes in 40.2% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. Celeron N2807 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

3015Ce makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

3015Ce vs Celeron N2807 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

3015Ce

The 3015Ce is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,099 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron N2807

The Celeron N2807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.58 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The 3015Ce packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron N2807's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015Ce versus 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N2807 — a 6.3% clock advantage for the 3015Ce (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.58 GHz). The 3015Ce uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron N2807 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the 3015Ce scores 2,099 against the Celeron N2807's 2,093 — a 0.3% lead for the 3015Ce. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015Ce vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2807.

Feature	3015Ce	Celeron N2807
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+6%	2.16 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	1.58 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	4 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Pollock (Zen) (2020)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	2,099	2,093
Geekbench 6 Single	—	180
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	320

🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3015Ce uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N2807 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the 3015Ce versus DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron N2807 — the 3015Ce supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The 3015Ce supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (3015Ce) vs 4 (Celeron N2807) — the 3015Ce offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP5 (3015Ce) and SoC (Celeron N2807).

Feature	3015Ce	Celeron N2807
Socket	FT5	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600+20%	DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8+100%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (3015Ce) vs VT-x (Celeron N2807). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (2-Core) (3015Ce) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2807) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2807 targets Netbook. Direct competitor: 3015Ce rivals Celeron N4020; Celeron N2807 rivals AMD E1-6010.

Feature	3015Ce	Celeron N2807
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics (2-Core)	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x
Target Use	—	Netbook

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the 3015Ce was priced at $150, while the Celeron N2807 came in at $107. On launch pricing ($150 vs $107), Celeron N2807 was $43 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the 3015Ce delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 19.6 pts/$ for the Celeron N2807 — making the Celeron N2807 the 33.2% better value option.

Feature	3015Ce	Celeron N2807
MSRP	$150	$107-29%
Performance per Dollar	14.0	19.6+40%
Release Date	2020	2014

Search 3015Ce on Amazon

Search Celeron N2807 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.