Celeron B810 vs Celeron M 900

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B810 vs Celeron M 900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B810 vs Celeron M 900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B810

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Celeron M 900 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,091 vs 2,101).

Celeron M 900

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B810 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 900 better than Celeron B810?

Yes. Celeron M 900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron M 900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 900 is the better buy right now. Celeron M 900 comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $86 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.5% better value on MSRP (24.4 vs 24.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron B810 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron B810 vs Celeron M 900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B810

The Celeron B810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,091 points. Launch price was $86.

Celeron M 900

The Celeron M 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,101 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron B810 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 900 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron B810 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B810 versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron M 900 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Celeron M 900. The Celeron B810 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron M 900 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B810 scores 2,091 against the Celeron M 900's 2,101 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron M 900.

Feature	Celeron B810	Celeron M 900
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.2 GHz+38%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	2,091	2,101

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B810 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 900 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron B810	Celeron M 900
Socket	PGA988	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B810) / not specified (Celeron M 900). The Celeron B810 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron M 900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B810 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B810 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron B810	Celeron M 900
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron B810 was priced at $86, while the Celeron M 900 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($86 vs $86), Celeron M 900 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B810 delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 24.4 pts/$ for the Celeron M 900 — making the Celeron M 900 the 0.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron B810	Celeron M 900
MSRP	$86	$86
Performance per Dollar	24.3	24.4
Release Date	2011	2009

Search Celeron B810 on Amazon

Search Celeron M 900 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.