Celeron B810 vs Celeron 6305

CPU

GPU

Celeron B810

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011

Celeron 6305

2 Cores2 Thrd2.5 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron B810

2 / 2

2,091

+0.7%

2,077

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron B810 is positioned at rank 801 and the Celeron 6305 is on rank 897, so the Celeron B810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B810

#789

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1207%

#790

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1189%

#791

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1092%

#792

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1087%

#793

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1077%

#795

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1040%

#796

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

997%

#797

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

995%

#798

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

969%

#801

Celeron B810

MSRP: $86|Avg: $86

100%

#803

Core i7-1365UE

MSRP: $429|Avg: $429

100%

#805

3020e

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

99%

#809

Athlon II M320

MSRP: $75|Avg: $15

98%

#810

Celeron B800

MSRP: $80|Avg: $5

98%

#811

Celeron B710

MSRP: $86|Avg: $10

98%

#812

Athlon II Neo K345

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 6305

#885

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1512%

#886

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1489%

#887

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1367%

#888

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1361%

#889

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1349%

#891

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1302%

#892

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1249%

#893

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1247%

#894

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1213%

#897

Celeron 6305

MSRP: $107|Avg: $80

100%

#900

Core i7-8705G

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

98%

#902

Pentium Dual Core T2410

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

98%

#903

FX-8800P

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

97%

#904

Core i7-8809G

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

97%

#911

Core i7-6820HK

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

96%

#912

Athlon II Neo K325

MSRP: $60|Avg: $25

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 6305 (2020) utilizes 10 nm SuperFin technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Celeron B810	Celeron 6305
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($86)	✅ More affordable ($80)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)	✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) / 10 nm SuperFin)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron B810 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Celeron B810	Celeron 6305
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+7%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($86)	✅ More affordable ($80)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron B810 Benchmark Check

Celeron 6305 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron B810 and Celeron 6305

Celeron B810

The Celeron B810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,091 points. Launch price was $86.

Celeron 6305

The Celeron 6305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B810 and Celeron 6305 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B810 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 6305 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Celeron 6305. The Celeron B810 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 6305 uses Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Celeron B810 scores 2,091 against the Celeron 6305's 2,077 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron B810. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B810 vs 4 MB on the Celeron 6305.

Feature	Celeron B810	Celeron 6305
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	4 MB+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2.5 MB+900%
Process	32 nm	10 nm SuperFin-69%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)
PassMark	2,091	2,077
Geekbench 6 Single	—	744
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,236

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B810 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 6305 uses FCBGA1449 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B810 versus DDR4-3200 on the Celeron 6305 — the Celeron 6305 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 6305 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron B810) vs 4 (Celeron 6305) — the Celeron B810 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B810) and Tiger Lake-U (Celeron 6305).

Feature	Celeron B810	Celeron 6305
Socket	PGA988	FCBGA1449
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR4-3200+33%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron B810) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 6305). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B810) and UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (Celeron 6305) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B810 targets Budget, Celeron 6305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B810 rivals Pentium 967; Celeron 6305 rivals Pentium Gold 7505.

Feature	Celeron B810	Celeron 6305
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	UHD Graphics for 11th Gen
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron B810 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Celeron 6305 debuted at $107. At current prices ($86 vs $80), the Celeron 6305 is $6 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B810 delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 26.0 pts/$ for the Celeron 6305 — making the Celeron 6305 the 6.6% better value option.