Celeron B830 vs Celeron E1500

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B830 vs Celeron E1500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B830 vs Celeron E1500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B830

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Celeron E1500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron E1500

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron B830 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (765 vs 815).
❌Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while Celeron B830 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B830 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron B830 better than Celeron E1500?

Yes. Celeron B830 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron B830 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B830 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron B830 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron B830 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron E1500 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (14.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron B830 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron B830 vs Celeron E1500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B830

The Celeron B830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 815 points. Launch price was $86.

Celeron E1500

The Celeron E1500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 November 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $63.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B830 and Celeron E1500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron B830 versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron E1500 — a 20% clock advantage for the Celeron E1500 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Celeron B830 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron E1500 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B830 scores 815 against the Celeron E1500's 765 — a 6.3% lead for the Celeron B830. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B830 vs 0 kB on the Celeron E1500.

Feature	Celeron B830	Celeron E1500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.2 GHz+22%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.2 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (total)+100%
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark	815+7%	765
Geekbench 6 Single	—	285
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	515

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B830 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron E1500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B830 versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron E1500 — the Celeron B830 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron B830 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron B830) vs 0 (Celeron E1500) — the Celeron B830 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B830) and G31,P35,G41 (Celeron E1500).

Feature	Celeron B830	Celeron E1500
Socket	PGA988	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+67%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron B830) vs No (Celeron E1500). The Celeron B830 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron E1500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B830 targets Budget, Celeron E1500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B830 rivals Pentium 967; Celeron E1500 rivals Pentium E2200.