Celeron B830 vs Celeron N3010

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B830 vs Celeron N3010 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B830 vs Celeron N3010: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B830

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron N3010

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron B830 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (735 vs 815).
❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Celeron B830 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron B830 better than Celeron N3010?

Yes. Celeron B830 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 10.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron B830 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B830 is the stronger fit. You are getting 10.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron B830 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron B830 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron N3010 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 9.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3010 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron B830 vs Celeron N3010 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B830

The Celeron B830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 815 points. Launch price was $86.

Celeron N3010

The Celeron N3010 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.04 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 735 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B830 and Celeron N3010 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron B830 versus 2.24 GHz on the Celeron N3010 — a 21.8% clock advantage for the Celeron N3010 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.04 GHz). The Celeron B830 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N3010 uses Airmont (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B830 scores 815 against the Celeron N3010's 735 — a 10.3% lead for the Celeron B830. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B830 vs 0 kB on the Celeron N3010.

Feature	Celeron B830	Celeron N3010
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.24 GHz+24%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz+73%	1.04 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Airmont (2016)
PassMark	815+11%	735

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B830 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N3010 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B830 versus 1600 on the Celeron N3010 — the Celeron N3010 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron B830 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron B830) vs 4 (Celeron N3010) — the Celeron B830 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B830) and Braswell (Celeron N3010).

Feature	Celeron B830	Celeron N3010
Socket	PGA988	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron B830) vs true (Celeron N3010). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B830) and Intel HD Graphics 400 (Celeron N3010) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B830 targets Budget, Celeron N3010 targets Budget Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron B830 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron B830	Celeron N3010
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	Intel HD Graphics 400
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	true
Target Use	Budget	Budget Mobile