
Celeron B840 vs Athlon II X2 235e

Celeron B840

Athlon II X2 235e
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron B840 is positioned at rank 1028 and the Athlon II X2 235e is on rank 888, so the Athlon II X2 235e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron B840
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 235e
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron B840 | Athlon II X2 235e |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron B840 | Athlon II X2 235e |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron B840 and Athlon II X2 235e

Celeron B840
The Celeron B840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,065 points. Launch price was $86.

Athlon II X2 235e
The Athlon II X2 235e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,079 points. Launch price was $84.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron B840 and Athlon II X2 235e share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron B840 versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X2 235e — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 235e (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Celeron B840 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X2 235e uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B840 scores 1,065 against the Athlon II X2 235e's 1,079 — a 1.3% lead for the Athlon II X2 235e. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 240, a 60.9% lead for the Celeron B840 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 790 vs 450 (54.8% advantage for the Celeron B840). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B840 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 235e.
| Feature | Celeron B840 | Athlon II X2 235e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.7 GHz+42% |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.7 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,065 | 1,079+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 450+88% | 240 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 790+76% | 450 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron B840 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 235e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Celeron B840 versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 235e — the Celeron B840 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron B840) vs 0 (Athlon II X2 235e) — the Celeron B840 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67 (Celeron B840) and 760G,780G,785G,790GX (Athlon II X2 235e).
| Feature | Celeron B840 | Athlon II X2 235e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+44333% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 16 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron B840) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X2 235e). The Celeron B840 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Athlon II X2 235e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B840 targets Budget, Athlon II X2 235e targets Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron B840 rivals Pentium B940; Athlon II X2 235e rivals Pentium E5300.
| Feature | Celeron B840 | Athlon II X2 235e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Celeron B840 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Athlon II X2 235e debuted at $69. At current prices ($15 vs $15), the Athlon II X2 235e is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B840 delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 71.9 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 235e — making the Athlon II X2 235e the 1.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron B840 | Athlon II X2 235e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86 | $69-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0 | 71.9+1% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















