CPU
GPU
Celeron E1400
Atom D2560
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron E1400 is positioned at rank 930 and the Atom D2560 is on rank 218, so the Atom D2560 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron E1400
Performance Per Dollar Atom D2560
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron E1400 | Atom D2560 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($63) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Cedarview (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron E1400 | Atom D2560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($63) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron E1400 and Atom D2560
Celeron E1400
The Celeron E1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $57.
Atom D2560
The Atom D2560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron E1400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom D2560's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron E1400 versus 2 GHz on the Atom D2560 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron E1400 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom D2560 uses Cedarview (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E1400 scores 715 against the Atom D2560's 765 — a 6.8% lead for the Atom D2560. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron E1400 vs 1 MB on the Atom D2560.
| Feature | Celeron E1400 | Atom D2560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (total) | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Allendale (2006−2009) | Cedarview (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 715 | 765+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 260 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 470 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron E1400 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom D2560 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Celeron E1400 versus DDR3-1066 on the Atom D2560 — the Atom D2560 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron E1400 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron E1400) vs 1 (Atom D2560). PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron E1400) vs 4 (Atom D2560) — the Atom D2560 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: G31,P35,G41 (Celeron E1400) and Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2560).
| Feature | Celeron E1400 | Atom D2560 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-1066+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Celeron E1400) / not specified (Atom D2560). The Atom D2560 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Celeron E1400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron E1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1400 rivals Pentium E2180.
| Feature | Celeron E1400 | Atom D2560 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel GMA 3650 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron E1400 and Atom D2560
