Celeron E1400 vs Pentium D 915

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E1400 vs Pentium D 915 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E1400 vs Pentium D 915: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E1400

2008

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $74 MSRP).
✅Delivers 41.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $74 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium D 915

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (705 vs 715).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 13.5 PassMark/$ ($74 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E1400 better than Pentium D 915?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium D 915 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E1400 pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E1400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron E1400 is the better buy right now. Celeron E1400 comes in $21 cheaper on MSRP at $53 MSRP versus $74 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Pentium D 915 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 41.6% better value on MSRP (13.5 vs 9.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron E1400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron E1400 vs Pentium D 915 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E1400

The Celeron E1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $57.

Pentium D 915

The Pentium D 915 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $74.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron E1400 and Pentium D 915 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron E1400 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium D 915 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Pentium D 915 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron E1400 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium D 915 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E1400 scores 715 against the Pentium D 915's 705 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron E1400. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron E1400	Pentium D 915
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.8 GHz+40%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.8 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (total)	2 MB (total)+300%
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Allendale (2006−2009)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	715+1%	705
Geekbench 6 Single	260	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	470	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1.

Feature	Celeron E1400	Pentium D 915
Socket	LGA775	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron E1400) / not specified (Pentium D 915). Primary use case: Celeron E1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1400 rivals Pentium E2180.

Feature	Celeron E1400	Pentium D 915
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	No	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron E1400 was priced at $53, while the Pentium D 915 came in at $74. On launch pricing ($53 vs $74), Celeron E1400 was $21 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E1400 delivers 13.5 pts/$ vs 9.5 pts/$ for the Pentium D 915 — making the Celeron E1400 the 34.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron E1400	Pentium D 915
MSRP	$53-28%	$74
Performance per Dollar	13.5+42%	9.5
Release Date	2008	2006

Search Celeron E1400 on Amazon

Search Pentium D 915 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.