CPU
GPU
Celeron E1400
Pentium SU4100
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron E1400 is positioned at rank 930 and the Pentium SU4100 is on rank 1235, so the Celeron E1400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron E1400
Performance Per Dollar Pentium SU4100
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron E1400 | Pentium SU4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($63) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron E1400 | Pentium SU4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+302%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($63) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron E1400 and Pentium SU4100
Celeron E1400
The Celeron E1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $57.
Pentium SU4100
The Pentium SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron E1400 and Pentium SU4100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron E1400 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU4100 — a 42.4% clock advantage for the Celeron E1400 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron E1400 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium SU4100 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E1400 scores 715 against the Pentium SU4100's 685 — a 4.3% lead for the Celeron E1400. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Celeron E1400 | Pentium SU4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+54% | 1.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz+54% | 1.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (total) | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Allendale (2006−2009) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 715+4% | 685 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 260 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 470 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron E1400 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron E1400 | Pentium SU4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Celeron E1400) / not specified (Pentium SU4100). Primary use case: Celeron E1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1400 rivals Pentium E2180.
| Feature | Celeron E1400 | Pentium SU4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron E1400 launched at $53 MSRP, while the Pentium SU4100 debuted at $289. At current prices ($63 vs $15), the Pentium SU4100 is $48 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E1400 delivers 11.3 pts/$ vs 45.7 pts/$ for the Pentium SU4100 — making the Pentium SU4100 the 120.4% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron E1400 | Pentium SU4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $53-82% | $289 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $63 | $15-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3 | 45.7+304% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron E1400 and Pentium SU4100
