Celeron E1500 vs Celeron E1600

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E1500 vs Celeron E1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E1500 vs Celeron E1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E1500

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron E1600 across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (515 vs 560).

Celeron E1600

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E1600 better than Celeron E1500?

Yes. Celeron E1600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 38 shared CPU game tests in our data, 8.7% better Geekbench multi-core, 6.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron E1600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.3% more average FPS across 38 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E1600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 8.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron E1600 is the better buy right now. Celeron E1600 comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $53 MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 38 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 6.5% better value on MSRP (15.4 vs 14.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron E1600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron E1500 vs Celeron E1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E1500

The Celeron E1500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 November 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $63.

Celeron E1600

The Celeron E1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 815 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron E1500 and Celeron E1600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron E1500 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron E1600 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Celeron E1600 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). Both are built on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture using a 65 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron E1500 scores 765 against the Celeron E1600's 815 — a 6.3% lead for the Celeron E1600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 285 vs 310, a 8.4% lead for the Celeron E1600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 515 vs 560 (8.4% advantage for the Celeron E1600). Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron E1500	Celeron E1600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (total)	512 kB (total)
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Allendale (2006−2009)	Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark	765	815+7%
Geekbench 6 Single	285	310+9%
Geekbench 6 Multi	515	560+9%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: G31,P35,G41 (Celeron E1500) and G31,P35,G41 (Celeron E1600).

Feature	Celeron E1500	Celeron E1600
Socket	LGA775	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support No virtualization. Primary use case: Celeron E1500 targets Budget, Celeron E1600 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1500 rivals Pentium E2200; Celeron E1600 rivals Pentium E2220.

Feature	Celeron E1500	Celeron E1600
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	No
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron E1500 was priced at $53, while the Celeron E1600 came in at $53. On launch pricing ($53 vs $53), Celeron E1600 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E1500 delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Celeron E1600 — making the Celeron E1600 the 6.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron E1500	Celeron E1600
MSRP	$53	$53
Performance per Dollar	14.4	15.4+7%
Release Date	2008	2009

Search Celeron E1500 on Amazon

Search Celeron E1600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.