Celeron E1500 vs Celeron T1600
Celeron E1500
Celeron T1600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron E1500 is positioned at rank 907 and the Celeron T1600 is on rank 1173, so the Celeron E1500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron E1500
Performance Per Dollar Celeron T1600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron E1500 | Celeron T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron E1500 | Celeron T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+221%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron E1500 and Celeron T1600
Celeron E1500
The Celeron E1500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 November 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $63.
Celeron T1600
The Celeron T1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron E1500 is built on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron E1500 scores 765 against the Celeron T1600's 715 — a 6.8% lead for the Celeron E1500. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron E1500 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1600.
| Feature | Celeron E1500 | Celeron T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+33% | 1.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (total) | — |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Allendale (2006−2009) | — |
| PassMark | 765+7% | 715 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 285 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 515 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron E1500 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron T1600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron E1500 | Celeron T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Celeron E1500) / not specified (Celeron T1600). Primary use case: Celeron E1500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1500 rivals Pentium E2200.
| Feature | Celeron E1500 | Celeron T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron E1500 launched at $53 MSRP, while the Celeron T1600 debuted at $107. At current prices ($5 vs $15), the Celeron E1500 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E1500 delivers 153.0 pts/$ vs 47.7 pts/$ for the Celeron T1600 — making the Celeron E1500 the 105% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron E1500 | Celeron T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $53-50% | $107 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-67% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 153.0+221% | 47.7 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron E1500 and Celeron T1600
