Celeron E1500 vs Celeron T1600

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E1500 vs Celeron T1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E1500 vs Celeron T1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E1500

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $54 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 116.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Celeron T1600

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron E1500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (715 vs 765).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E1500 better than Celeron T1600?

Yes. Celeron E1500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron E1500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E1500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron E1500 is the better buy right now. Celeron E1500 comes in $54 cheaper on MSRP at $53 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 116.0% better value on MSRP (14.4 vs 6.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron E1500 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Celeron E1500 vs Celeron T1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E1500

The Celeron E1500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 November 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $63.

Celeron T1600

The Celeron T1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron E1500 is built on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron E1500 scores 765 against the Celeron T1600's 715 — a 6.8% lead for the Celeron E1500. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron E1500 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1600.

Feature	Celeron E1500	Celeron T1600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+33%	1.66 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB (total)	—
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Allendale (2006−2009)	—
PassMark	765+7%	715
Geekbench 6 Single	285	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	515	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron E1500 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron T1600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron E1500	Celeron T1600
Socket	LGA775	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron E1500) / not specified (Celeron T1600). Primary use case: Celeron E1500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1500 rivals Pentium E2200.

Feature	Celeron E1500	Celeron T1600
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	No	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron E1500 was priced at $53, while the Celeron T1600 came in at $107. On launch pricing ($53 vs $107), Celeron E1500 was $54 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E1500 delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 6.7 pts/$ for the Celeron T1600 — making the Celeron E1500 the 73.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron E1500	Celeron T1600
MSRP	$53-50%	$107
Performance per Dollar	14.4+115%	6.7
Release Date	2008	2008

Search Celeron E1500 on Amazon

Search Celeron T1600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.