Celeron E1600 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E1600 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E1600 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E1600

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
✅Delivers 47.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.4 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium Dual-Core E2160 across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (815 vs 875).

Pentium Dual-Core E2160

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Dual-Core E2160 better than Celeron E1600?

Yes. Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.0% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data and 7.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.0% more average FPS across 39 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium Dual-Core E2160 comes in 58.5% more expensive on MSRP at $84 MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.0% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron E1600 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 47.6% better value on paper (15.4 vs 10.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron E1600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron E1600 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E1600

The Celeron E1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 815 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium Dual-Core E2160

The Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 875 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron E1600 and Pentium Dual-Core E2160 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron E1600 versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Celeron E1600. The Celeron E1600 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E1600 scores 815 against the Pentium Dual-Core E2160's 875 — a 7.1% lead for the Pentium Dual-Core E2160. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron E1600	Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+33%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (total)	1 MB (total)+100%
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Allendale (2006−2009)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	815	875+7%
Geekbench 6 Single	310	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	560	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1.

Feature	Celeron E1600	Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Socket	LGA775	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron E1600) / not specified (Pentium Dual-Core E2160). Primary use case: Celeron E1600 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1600 rivals Pentium E2220.

Feature	Celeron E1600	Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	No	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron E1600 was priced at $53, while the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 came in at $84. On launch pricing ($53 vs $84), Celeron E1600 was $31 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E1600 delivers 15.4 pts/$ vs 10.4 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 — making the Celeron E1600 the 38.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron E1600	Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP	$53-37%	$84
Performance per Dollar	15.4+48%	10.4
Release Date	2009	2007

Search Celeron E1600 on Amazon

Search Pentium Dual-Core E2160 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.