Celeron E3300
VS
Phenom X3 8550

Celeron E3300 vs Phenom X3 8550

Intel

Celeron E3300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Phenom X3 8550

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron E3300 is positioned at rank 724 and the Phenom X3 8550 is on rank 513, so the Phenom X3 8550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13494%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12751%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9258%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2789%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2209%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1933%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1107%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1092%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
995%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
995%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
984%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
957%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
944%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
940%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
931%
#724
Celeron E3300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#725
Core i7-6700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $60
100%
#726
Core i7-4790K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $93
100%
#727
Celeron E3400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $15
100%
#728
FX-4100
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
99%
#729
Core i5-7440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
99%
#730
Core i5-3350P
MSRP: $189|Avg: $25
99%
#732
Core i3-4350T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $20
99%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
98%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
98%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
98%
#737
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
97%
#738
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
97%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X3 8550

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8124%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7676%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5574%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1679%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1330%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1164%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
666%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
658%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
599%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
599%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
592%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
576%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
568%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
566%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
561%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
99%
#513
Phenom X3 8550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#515
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
100%
#518
Pentium G2030T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
99%
#519
Athlon X4 730
MSRP: $60|Avg: $52
99%
#520
Core i3-7101E
MSRP: $117|Avg: $50
99%
#522
Athlon II X4 740
MSRP: $71|Avg: $20
98%
#525
Celeron G1840T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
98%
#527
Pentium G4500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $34
97%
#528
Athlon X4 740
MSRP: $71|Avg: $71
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron E3300 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Phenom X3 8550 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron E3300Phenom X3 8550
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Toliman (2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron E3300Phenom X3 8550
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron E3300 and Phenom X3 8550

Intel

Celeron E3300

The Celeron E3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,155 points. Launch price was $70.

AMD

Phenom X3 8550

The Phenom X3 8550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Abril 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,151 points. Launch price was $170.

Processing Power

The Celeron E3300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X3 8550 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8550 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron E3300 versus 2.2 GHz on the Phenom X3 8550 — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Celeron E3300. The Celeron E3300 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom X3 8550 uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E3300 scores 1,155 against the Phenom X3 8550's 1,151 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron E3300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron E3300 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8550.

FeatureCeleron E3300Phenom X3 8550
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+14%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Toliman (2008)
PassMark
1,155
1,151
Geekbench 6 Single
347
Geekbench 6 Multi
624
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron E3300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Phenom X3 8550 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron E3300Phenom X3 8550
Socket
LGA775
AM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron E3300) / not specified (Phenom X3 8550). Primary use case: Celeron E3300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3300 rivals Pentium E5200.

FeatureCeleron E3300Phenom X3 8550
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget