Celeron E3300 vs Xeon W3505

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E3300 vs Xeon W3505 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E3300 vs Xeon W3505: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E3300

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,155 vs 1,163).
❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Xeon W3505 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon W3505

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E3300 better than Xeon W3505?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3505 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron E3300 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3505 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron E3300 is the better buy right now. Celeron E3300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W3505 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W3505 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron E3300 vs Xeon W3505 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E3300

The Celeron E3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,155 points. Launch price was $70.

Xeon W3505

The Xeon W3505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 0.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,163 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron E3300 and Xeon W3505 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron E3300 versus 0.53 GHz on the Xeon W3505 — a 130% clock advantage for the Celeron E3300 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Celeron E3300 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon W3505 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E3300 scores 1,155 against the Xeon W3505's 1,163 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W3505. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron E3300 vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon W3505.

Feature	Celeron E3300	Xeon W3505
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+372%	0.53 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.53 GHz+1%
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,155	1,163
Geekbench 6 Single	347	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	624	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron E3300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon W3505 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron E3300	Xeon W3505
Socket	LGA775	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron E3300) / not specified (Xeon W3505). Primary use case: Celeron E3300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3300 rivals Pentium E5200.