PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1610 vs Core i3-2340UE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1610 vs Core i3-2340UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1610

2012

Why buy it

✅+98.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $158 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 377.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.9 vs 7.7 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌223.5% higher power demand at 55W vs 17W.

Core i3-2340UE

2011

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 17W instead of 55W, a 38W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (230 vs 456).
❌Lower PassMark (1,545 vs 1,550).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.7 vs 36.9 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1610 better than Core i3-2340UE?

Yes. Celeron G1610 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1610 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1610 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1610 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1610 comes in $158 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 377.7% better value on MSRP (36.9 vs 7.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1610 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1610 vs Core i3-2340UE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1610

The Celeron G1610 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,550 points. Launch price was $388.

Core i3-2340UE

The Core i3-2340UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,545 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1610 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2340UE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G1610 versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2340UE — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G1610. The Celeron G1610 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-2340UE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1610 scores 1,550 against the Core i3-2340UE's 1,545 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G1610. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 456 vs 230, a 65.9% lead for the Celeron G1610 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1610 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2340UE.

Feature	Celeron G1610	Core i3-2340UE
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+100%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,550	1,545
Geekbench 6 Single	456+98%	230
Geekbench 6 Multi	778	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1610 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2340UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Celeron G1610 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Celeron G1610) and HM65,QM67 (Core i3-2340UE).

Feature	Celeron G1610	Core i3-2340UE
Socket	LGA1155	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1610) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2340UE). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron G1610) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2340UE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1610 targets Budget, Core i3-2340UE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron G1610 rivals Pentium G2020; Core i3-2340UE rivals Embedded G-Series.

Feature	Celeron G1610	Core i3-2340UE
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	Budget	Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G1610 was priced at $42, while the Core i3-2340UE came in at $200. On launch pricing ($42 vs $200), Celeron G1610 was $158 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1610 delivers 36.9 pts/$ vs 7.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-2340UE — making the Celeron G1610 the 130.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G1610	Core i3-2340UE
MSRP	$42-79%	$200
Performance per Dollar	36.9+379%	7.7
Release Date	2012	2011

Search Celeron G1610 on Amazon

Search Core i3-2340UE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.