Celeron G1610
VS
Core i5-4202Y

Celeron G1610 vs Core i5-4202Y

Intel

Celeron G1610

2 Cores2 Thrd55 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-4202Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1610 is positioned at rank 531 and the Core i5-4202Y is on rank 964, so the Celeron G1610 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1610

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8448%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7982%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5796%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1746%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1383%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1210%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
693%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
684%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
623%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
623%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
616%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
599%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
591%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
588%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
583%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
96%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
94%
#531
Celeron G1610
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
100%
#532
Core i3-7100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
100%
#533
Celeron G1620T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $15
99%
#536
Pentium G4400T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $75
98%
#539
Athlon X4 850
MSRP: $77|Avg: $20
97%
#541
FX-6350
MSRP: $132|Avg: $55
95%
#542
Celeron G470
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
95%
#543
Pentium G3220
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
95%
#545
Athlon 5370
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4202Y

#952
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1890%
#953
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1863%
#954
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1710%
#955
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1702%
#956
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1687%
#958
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1629%
#959
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1562%
#960
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1559%
#961
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1517%
#964
Core i5-4202Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#968
Core i7-4710MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
99%
#970
Celeron T3100
MSRP: $62|Avg: $62
98%
#971
Core i7-4800MQ
MSRP: $380|Avg: $378
98%
#977
Phenom II X2 N640
MSRP: $100|Avg: $55
97%
#978
A10-8700P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-4202Y delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron G1610 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron G1610Core i5-4202Y
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron G1610Core i5-4202Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1610 and Core i5-4202Y

Intel

Celeron G1610

The Celeron G1610 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,550 points. Launch price was $388.

Intel

Core i5-4202Y

The Core i5-4202Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,552 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron G1610 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4202Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G1610 versus 2 GHz on the Core i5-4202Y — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G1610 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron G1610 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-4202Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1610 scores 1,550 against the Core i5-4202Y's 1,552 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-4202Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 456 vs 589, a 25.5% lead for the Core i5-4202Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 778 vs 1,030 (27.9% advantage for the Core i5-4202Y). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1610 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4202Y.

FeatureCeleron G1610Core i5-4202Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+30%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+63%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB+50%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,550
1,552
Geekbench 6 Single
456
589+29%
Geekbench 6 Multi
778
1,030+32%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1610 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4202Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Celeron G1610 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1610) vs 12 (Core i5-4202Y) — the Celeron G1610 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Celeron G1610) and HM86,HM87 (Core i5-4202Y).

FeatureCeleron G1610Core i5-4202Y
Socket
LGA1155
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1610) vs VT-x / EPT (Core i5-4202Y). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron G1610) and Intel HD Graphics 4200 (Core i5-4202Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1610 targets Budget, Core i5-4202Y targets Ultra-portable. Direct competitor: Celeron G1610 rivals Pentium G2020.

FeatureCeleron G1610Core i5-4202Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Intel HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x / EPT
Target Use
Budget
Ultra-portable