CPU
GPU
Celeron G1610T
Core i5-480M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1610T is positioned at rank 575 and the Core i5-480M is on rank 6, so the Core i5-480M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1610T
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-480M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G1610T | Core i5-480M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($42) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($77) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G1610T | Core i5-480M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+84%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($42) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($77) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1610T and Core i5-480M
Celeron G1610T
The Celeron G1610T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $89.
Core i5-480M
The Core i5-480M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,327 points. Launch price was $81.
Processing Power
The Celeron G1610T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-480M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron G1610T versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i5-480M — a 24.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-480M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron G1610T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-480M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1610T scores 1,333 against the Core i5-480M's 1,327 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G1610T. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1610T vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-480M.
| Feature | Celeron G1610T | Core i5-480M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.93 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.66 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 3 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,333 | 1,327 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 393 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 674 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G1610T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-480M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1610T versus 1066 on the Core i5-480M — the Core i5-480M supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1610T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Celeron G1610T) and HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-480M).
| Feature | Celeron G1610T | Core i5-480M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | 1066+35433% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+419430300% | 8 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1610T) vs true (Core i5-480M). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron G1610T) and Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) (Core i5-480M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1610T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1610T rivals Pentium G2020T; Core i5-480M rivals AMD Turion II M620.
| Feature | Celeron G1610T | Core i5-480M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | true |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G1610T launched at $42 MSRP, while the Core i5-480M debuted at $81. At current prices ($42 vs $77), the Celeron G1610T is $35 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1610T delivers 31.7 pts/$ vs 17.2 pts/$ for the Core i5-480M — making the Celeron G1610T the 59.2% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G1610T | Core i5-480M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-48% | $81 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $42-45% | $77 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.7+84% | 17.2 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G1610T and Core i5-480M
