PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1610T vs Pentium Dual Core T4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1610T vs Pentium Dual Core T4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1610T

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $108 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 256.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium Dual Core T4500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,333 vs 1,336).

Pentium Dual Core T4500

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 31.7 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1610T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Dual Core T4500 better than Celeron G1610T?

Yes. Pentium Dual Core T4500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T4500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium Dual Core T4500 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium Dual Core T4500 comes in 257.1% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G1610T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 256.3% better value on paper (31.7 vs 8.9 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1610T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1610T vs Pentium Dual Core T4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1610T

The Celeron G1610T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $89.

Pentium Dual Core T4500

The Pentium Dual Core T4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,336 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1610T and Pentium Dual Core T4500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron G1610T versus 2.3 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4500 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Celeron G1610T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T4500 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1610T scores 1,333 against the Pentium Dual Core T4500's 1,336 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T4500. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1610T vs 0 kB on the Pentium Dual Core T4500.

Feature	Celeron G1610T	Pentium Dual Core T4500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,333	1,336
Geekbench 6 Single	393	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	674	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1610T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T4500 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1610T versus DDR3-800 on the Pentium Dual Core T4500 — the Celeron G1610T supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1610T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1610T) vs 0 (Pentium Dual Core T4500) — the Celeron G1610T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron G1610T	Pentium Dual Core T4500
Socket	LGA1155	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+67%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1610T) vs No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T4500). The Celeron G1610T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium Dual Core T4500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1610T targets Budget, Pentium Dual Core T4500 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron G1610T rivals Pentium G2020T.

Feature	Celeron G1610T	Pentium Dual Core T4500
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	No VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G1610T was priced at $42, while the Pentium Dual Core T4500 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($42 vs $150), Celeron G1610T was $108 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1610T delivers 31.7 pts/$ vs 8.9 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T4500 — making the Celeron G1610T the 112.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G1610T	Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP	$42-72%	$150
Performance per Dollar	31.7+256%	8.9
Release Date	2012	2010

Search Celeron G1610T on Amazon

Search Pentium Dual Core T4500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.