A8-4555M
VS
Celeron G1610T

A8-4555M vs Celeron G1610T

AMD

A8-4555M

4 Cores4 Thrd19 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron G1610T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-4555M is positioned at rank 826 and the Celeron G1610T is on rank 575, so the Celeron G1610T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-4555M

#814
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1313%
#815
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1294%
#816
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1187%
#817
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1182%
#818
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1171%
#820
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1131%
#821
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1085%
#822
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1083%
#823
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1054%
#826
A8-4555M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#828
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
100%
#829
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
100%
#835
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#836
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#838
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1610T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9821%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9280%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6738%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2030%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1608%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1407%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
806%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
795%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
724%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
724%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
716%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
696%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
687%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
684%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
678%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
97%
#575
Celeron G1610T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#576
Athlon X4 750K
MSRP: $91|Avg: $17
100%
#577
Core i7-7700K
MSRP: $305|Avg: $140
99%
#578
Core i5-7600K
MSRP: $217|Avg: $84
99%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
99%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
98%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
98%
#583
FX-8370
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
98%
#584
Pentium G4520
MSRP: $86|Avg: $45
98%
#585
Core i3-4170
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
98%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
98%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
97%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
96%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A8-4555M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron G1610T in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA8-4555MCeleron G1610T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($42)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-4555MCeleron G1610T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($42)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-4555M and Celeron G1610T

AMD

A8-4555M

The A8-4555M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,341 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Celeron G1610T

The Celeron G1610T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $89.

Processing Power

The A8-4555M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G1610T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-4555M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A8-4555M versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron G1610T — a 4.3% clock advantage for the A8-4555M (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The A8-4555M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G1610T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-4555M scores 1,341 against the Celeron G1610T's 1,333 — a 0.6% lead for the A8-4555M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-4555M vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1610T.

FeatureA8-4555MCeleron G1610T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+4%
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.3 GHz+44%
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,341
1,333
Geekbench 6 Single
393
Geekbench 6 Multi
674
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-4555M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1610T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A8-4555M versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1610T — the A8-4555M supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1610T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A8-4555M) and H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Celeron G1610T).

FeatureA8-4555MCeleron G1610T
Socket
FP2
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1333+44333%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
32 GB+209715100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-4555M) vs VT-x (Celeron G1610T). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 7600G (A8-4555M) and HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron G1610T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1610T targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-4555M rivals Core i3-2367M; Celeron G1610T rivals Pentium G2020T.

FeatureA8-4555MCeleron G1610T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7600G
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x
Target Use
Budget