A8-4555M
VS
Athlon II X2 280

A8-4555M vs Athlon II X2 280

AMD

A8-4555M

4 Cores4 Thrd19 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 280

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-4555M is positioned at rank 826 and the Athlon II X2 280 is on rank 638, so the Athlon II X2 280 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-4555M

#814
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1313%
#815
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1294%
#816
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1187%
#817
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1182%
#818
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1171%
#820
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1131%
#821
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1085%
#822
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1083%
#823
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1054%
#826
A8-4555M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#828
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
100%
#829
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
100%
#835
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#836
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#838
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 280

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11502%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10869%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7892%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2377%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1883%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1647%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
944%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
931%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
848%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
848%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
838%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
816%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
804%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
801%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
794%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#639
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
100%
#640
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
100%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
100%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
99%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
99%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
99%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
98%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
98%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#653
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon II X2 280 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A8-4555M in both compute-intensive tasks (1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA8-4555MAthlon II X2 280
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-4555MAthlon II X2 280
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-4555M and Athlon II X2 280

AMD

A8-4555M

The A8-4555M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,341 points. Launch price was $90.

AMD

Athlon II X2 280

The Athlon II X2 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,355 points. Launch price was $100.

Processing Power

The A8-4555M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X2 280 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-4555M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A8-4555M versus 3.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 280 — a 40% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 280 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A8-4555M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X2 280 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-4555M scores 1,341 against the Athlon II X2 280's 1,355 — a 1% lead for the Athlon II X2 280. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA8-4555MAthlon II X2 280
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz+50%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz+125%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)+300%
1 MB
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,341
1,355+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
290
Geekbench 6 Multi
550
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-4555M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 280 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A8-4555M versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 280 — the A8-4555M supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-4555M) vs 0 (Athlon II X2 280) — the A8-4555M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A8-4555M) and 870,880G,890GX,890FX,970,990X,990FX (Athlon II X2 280).

FeatureA8-4555MAthlon II X2 280
Socket
FP2
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1333+44333%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
16 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-4555M) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X2 280). The A8-4555M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7600G), while the Athlon II X2 280 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 280 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-4555M rivals Core i3-2367M; Athlon II X2 280 rivals Pentium E6700.

FeatureA8-4555MAthlon II X2 280
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7600G
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Desktop