A8-4555M vs Core i3-L13G4

A8-4555M vs Core i3-L13G4 Performance Spectrum

A8-4555M

4 / 4

1,341

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-L13G4

5 / 5

1,349

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-4555M vs Core i3-L13G4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-4555M vs Core i3-L13G4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-4555M

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,341 vs 1,349).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 19W vs 7W.

Core i3-L13G4

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 19W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-L13G4 better than A8-4555M?

Yes. Core i3-L13G4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-L13G4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-L13G4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 5 cores and 5 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-L13G4 still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-L13G4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-L13G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 5 cores / 5 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-4555M vs Core i3-L13G4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-4555M

The A8-4555M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,341 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i3-L13G4

The Core i3-L13G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-4555M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-L13G4 offers 5 cores / 5 threads — the Core i3-L13G4 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A8-4555M versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-L13G4 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-L13G4 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The A8-4555M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-L13G4 uses Lakefield (2020) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A8-4555M scores 1,341 against the Core i3-L13G4's 1,349 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-L13G4. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-4555M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-L13G4.

Feature	A8-4555M	Core i3-L13G4
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	5 / 5+25%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+100%	0.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+700%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Lakefield (2020)
PassMark	1,341	1,349

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-4555M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-L13G4 uses FC-CSP1016 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A8-4555M versus LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i3-L13G4 — the Core i3-L13G4 supports 220.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-4555M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A8-4555M) vs 4 (Core i3-L13G4). PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-4555M) vs 8 (Core i3-L13G4) — the A8-4555M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A8-4555M	Core i3-L13G4
Socket	FP2	FC-CSP1016
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333	LPDDR4x-4267+220%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+100%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-4555M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-L13G4). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7600G (A8-4555M) and UHD Graphics (Core i3-L13G4) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-L13G4 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A8-4555M rivals Core i3-2367M.