A8-4555M vs Core i3-4010Y

A8-4555M vs Core i3-4010Y Performance Spectrum

A8-4555M

4 / 4

1,341

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4010Y

2 / 4

1,358

+1.3%

Celeron 867

Celeron P4500

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-4555M vs Core i3-4010Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-4555M vs Core i3-4010Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-4555M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 19W instead of 512W, a 493W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,341 vs 1,358).

Core i3-4010Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌2594.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 19W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4010Y better than A8-4555M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-4555M is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010Y pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4010Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-4010Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4010Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-4555M vs Core i3-4010Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-4555M

The A8-4555M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,341 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i3-4010Y

The Core i3-4010Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,358 points. Launch price was $297.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-4555M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4010Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-4555M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A8-4555M versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-4010Y — a 59.5% clock advantage for the A8-4555M (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The A8-4555M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4010Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-4555M scores 1,341 against the Core i3-4010Y's 1,358 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i3-4010Y. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-4555M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4010Y.

Feature	A8-4555M	Core i3-4010Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+85%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+23%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,341	1,358+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-4555M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4010Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A8-4555M versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4010Y — the Core i3-4010Y supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-4555M) vs 12 (Core i3-4010Y) — the A8-4555M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A8-4555M	Core i3-4010Y
Socket	FP2	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333	DDR3L-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-4555M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010Y). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7600G (A8-4555M) and HD Graphics 4200 (Core i3-4010Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4010Y targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A8-4555M rivals Core i3-2367M.