Celeron G1610T vs Pentium 3560M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1610T vs Pentium 3560M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1610T vs Pentium 3560M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1610T

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium 3560M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,333 vs 1,345).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Pentium 3560M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium 3560M

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1610T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 3560M better than Celeron G1610T?

Yes. Pentium 3560M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium 3560M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 3560M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium 3560M is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium 3560M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G1610T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (31.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 3560M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1610T vs Pentium 3560M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1610T

The Celeron G1610T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $89.

Pentium 3560M

The Pentium 3560M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,345 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1610T and Pentium 3560M share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron G1610T versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 3560M — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Pentium 3560M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron G1610T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium 3560M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1610T scores 1,333 against the Pentium 3560M's 1,345 — a 0.9% lead for the Pentium 3560M. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1610T vs 2 MB on the Pentium 3560M.

Feature	Celeron G1610T	Pentium 3560M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,333	1,345
Geekbench 6 Single	393	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	674	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1610T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 3560M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1610T	Pentium 3560M
Socket	LGA1155	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1610T) / not specified (Pentium 3560M). The Celeron G1610T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium 3560M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1610T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1610T rivals Pentium G2020T.