PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1630 vs Celeron G1820 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1630 vs Celeron G1820: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1630

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $68 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
✅Delivers 163.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.6 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (386 vs 496).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (635 vs 910).

Celeron G1820

2013

Why buy it

✅+28.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 54W instead of 55W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 40.6 PassMark/$ ($110 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1820 better than Celeron G1630?

Yes. Celeron G1820 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 43.3% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1820 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1820 is the stronger fit. You are getting 43.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1820 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron G1820 comes in 161.9% more expensive on MSRP at $110 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G1630 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 163.6% better value on paper (40.6 vs 15.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1820 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1630 vs Celeron G1820 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1630

The Celeron G1630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,707 points. Launch price was $80.

Celeron G1820

The Celeron G1820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,696 points. Launch price was $110.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1630 and Celeron G1820 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1630 versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G1820 — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G1630 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Celeron G1630 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G1820 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1630 scores 1,707 against the Celeron G1820's 1,696 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G1630. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 386 vs 496, a 24.9% lead for the Celeron G1820 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 635 vs 910 (35.6% advantage for the Celeron G1820). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1630 vs 2 MB on the Celeron G1820.

Feature	Celeron G1630	Celeron G1820
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+4%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+4%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,707	1,696
Geekbench 6 Single	386	496+28%
Geekbench 6 Multi	635	910+43%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1630 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1820 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Celeron G1630) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820).

Feature	Celeron G1630	Celeron G1820
Socket	LGA1155	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron G1630) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1630 targets Budget, Celeron G1820 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1630 rivals Pentium G2030; Celeron G1820 rivals Pentium G3220.

Feature	Celeron G1630	Celeron G1820
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G1630 was priced at $42, while the Celeron G1820 came in at $110. On launch pricing ($42 vs $110), Celeron G1630 was $68 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1630 delivers 40.6 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Celeron G1820 — making the Celeron G1630 the 90% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G1630	Celeron G1820
MSRP	$42-62%	$110
Performance per Dollar	40.6+164%	15.4
Release Date	2013	2013

Search Celeron G1630 on Amazon

Search Celeron G1820 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.