Celeron G1630 vs Pentium G2020

Intel

Celeron G1630

2 Cores2 Thrd55 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G2020

2 Cores2 Thrd55 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G1630 vs Pentium G2020 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1630 vs Pentium G2020 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1630 vs Pentium G2020: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1630

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.1% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $22 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
  • Delivers 52.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.6 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium G2020 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Pentium G2020

2013

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,705 vs 1,707).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.6 vs 40.6 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1630 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1630 better than Pentium G2020?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G2020 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1630 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Pentium G2020 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1630 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G1630 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1630 comes in $22 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Pentium G2020 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 52.6% better value on MSRP (40.6 vs 26.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G1630 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1630 vs Pentium G2020 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G1630

The Celeron G1630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,707 points. Launch price was $80.

Intel

Pentium G2020

The Pentium G2020 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,705 points. Launch price was $60.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1630 and Pentium G2020 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1630 versus 2.9 GHz on the Pentium G2020 — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Pentium G2020 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). Both are built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron G1630 scores 1,707 against the Pentium G2020's 1,705 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G1630. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1630 vs 3072 kB (total) on the Pentium G2020.

FeatureCeleron G1630Pentium G2020
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3072 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,707
1,705
Geekbench 6 Single
386
Geekbench 6 Multi
635
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureCeleron G1630Pentium G2020
Socket
LGA1155
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1630) / not specified (Pentium G2020). The Celeron G1630 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium G2020 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1630 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1630 rivals Pentium G2030.

FeatureCeleron G1630Pentium G2020
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G1630 was priced at $42, while the Pentium G2020 came in at $64. On launch pricing ($42 vs $64), Celeron G1630 was $22 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1630 delivers 40.6 pts/$ vs 26.6 pts/$ for the Pentium G2020 — making the Celeron G1630 the 41.6% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G1630Pentium G2020
MSRP
$42-34%
$64
Performance per Dollar
40.6+53%
26.6
Release Date
2013
2013

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.