Celeron 4305UE vs Celeron G1630

CPU

GPU

Celeron 4305UE

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 2 GHz2018

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G1630

2 Cores2 Thrd55 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2013

Buy on Amazon

Celeron 4305UE vs Celeron G1630 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 4305UE

2 / 2

1,699

0.0%

1,707

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 4305UE vs Celeron G1630 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 4305UE vs Celeron G1630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 4305UE

2018

Why buy it

✅+73.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 40.6 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

Celeron G1630

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $65 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 156.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.6 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (386 vs 670).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (635 vs 1,065).
❌266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 4305UE better than Celeron G1630?

Yes. Celeron 4305UE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data, 67.7% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 4305UE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 47 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 4305UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 67.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 4305UE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron 4305UE comes in 154.8% more expensive on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G1630 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 156.0% better value on paper (40.6 vs 15.9 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 4305UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 4305UE vs Celeron G1630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 4305UE

The Celeron 4305UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,699 points. Launch price was $107.

Celeron G1630

The Celeron G1630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,707 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 4305UE and Celeron G1630 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 4305UE versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1630 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G1630. The Celeron 4305UE uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Celeron G1630 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4305UE scores 1,699 against the Celeron G1630's 1,707 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G1630. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 670 vs 386, a 53.8% lead for the Celeron 4305UE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,065 vs 635 (50.6% advantage for the Celeron 4305UE). Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 4305UE	Celeron G1630
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.8 GHz+40%
Base Clock	—	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,699	1,707
Geekbench 6 Single	670+74%	386
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,065+68%	635

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 4305UE uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1630 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 4305UE versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1630 — the Celeron 4305UE supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 4305UE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Whiskey Lake (Celeron 4305UE) and H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Celeron G1630).

Feature	Celeron 4305UE	Celeron G1630
Socket	FCBGA1528	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+60%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron 4305UE) vs VT-x (Celeron G1630). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron 4305UE) and HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron G1630) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305UE targets Budget, Celeron G1630 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4305UE rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE; Celeron G1630 rivals Pentium G2030.

Feature	Celeron 4305UE	Celeron G1630
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 4305UE was priced at $107, while the Celeron G1630 came in at $42. On launch pricing ($107 vs $42), Celeron G1630 was $65 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 4305UE delivers 15.9 pts/$ vs 40.6 pts/$ for the Celeron G1630 — making the Celeron G1630 the 87.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 4305UE	Celeron G1630
MSRP	$107	$42-61%
Performance per Dollar	15.9	40.6+155%
Release Date	2018	2013

Search Celeron 4305UE on Amazon

Search Celeron G1630 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.