Celeron 4305UE vs Turion X2 RM-75

Celeron 4305UE vs Turion X2 RM-75 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 4305UE

2 / 2

1,699

0.0%

1,717

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 4305UE vs Turion X2 RM-75 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 4305UE vs Turion X2 RM-75: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 4305UE

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Turion X2 RM-75 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion X2 RM-75 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,699 vs 1,717).
❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Turion X2 RM-75 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1400% higher power demand at 15W vs 1W.

Turion X2 RM-75

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 4305UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion X2 RM-75 better than Celeron 4305UE?

Yes. Turion X2 RM-75 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion X2 RM-75 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.3% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion X2 RM-75 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion X2 RM-75 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Turion X2 RM-75 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 4305UE only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.3% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 4305UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 4305UE vs Turion X2 RM-75 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 4305UE

The Celeron 4305UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,699 points. Launch price was $107.

Turion X2 RM-75

The Turion X2 RM-75 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,717 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 4305UE and Turion X2 RM-75 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 4305UE versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-75 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Turion X2 RM-75. The Celeron 4305UE uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Turion X2 RM-75 uses Lion (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4305UE scores 1,699 against the Turion X2 RM-75's 1,717 — a 1.1% lead for the Turion X2 RM-75. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4305UE vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 RM-75.

Feature	Celeron 4305UE	Turion X2 RM-75
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	10 nm-85%	65 nm
Architecture	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)	Lion (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,699	1,717+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	670	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,065	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 4305UE uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion X2 RM-75 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 4305UE	Turion X2 RM-75
Socket	FCBGA1528	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron 4305UE) / not specified (Turion X2 RM-75). The Celeron 4305UE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Turion X2 RM-75 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305UE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4305UE rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.