A6-3600 vs Celeron 4305UE

CPU

GPU

A6-3600

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron 4305UE

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 2 GHz2018

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

A6-3600 vs Celeron 4305UE Performance Spectrum

A6-3600

4 / 4

1,718

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 4305UE

2 / 2

1,699

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-3600 vs Celeron 4305UE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-3600 vs Celeron 4305UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-3600

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $12 less on MSRP ($95 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 13.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($95 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron 4305UE.

Trade-offs

❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Celeron 4305UE

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A6-3600 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,699 vs 1,718).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $95 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-3600.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-3600 better than Celeron 4305UE?

Yes. A6-3600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-3600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-3600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-3600 is the better buy right now. A6-3600 comes in $12 cheaper on MSRP at $95 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 13.9% better value on MSRP (18.1 vs 15.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 4305UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-3600 vs Celeron 4305UE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-3600

The A6-3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,718 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron 4305UE

The Celeron 4305UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,699 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-3600 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 4305UE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-3600 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron 4305UE — a 18.2% clock advantage for the A6-3600. The A6-3600 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 4305UE uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3600 scores 1,718 against the Celeron 4305UE's 1,699 — a 1.1% lead for the A6-3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 253 vs 670, a 90.4% lead for the Celeron 4305UE that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3600 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4305UE.

Feature	A6-3600	Celeron 4305UE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark	1,718+1%	1,699
Geekbench 6 Single	253	670+165%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,065

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3600 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 4305UE uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-3600 versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 4305UE — the Celeron 4305UE supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 4305UE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A6-3600) and Whiskey Lake (Celeron 4305UE).

Feature	A6-3600	Celeron 4305UE
Socket	FM1	FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR4-2133+14%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3600) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron 4305UE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6530D (A6-3600) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron 4305UE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3600 targets Budget Desktop, Celeron 4305UE targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-3600 rivals Pentium G630; Celeron 4305UE rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.

Feature	A6-3600	Celeron 4305UE
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6530D	UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Budget Desktop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A6-3600 was priced at $95, while the Celeron 4305UE came in at $107. On launch pricing ($95 vs $107), A6-3600 was $12 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-3600 delivers 18.1 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Celeron 4305UE — making the A6-3600 the 13% better value option.

Feature	A6-3600	Celeron 4305UE
MSRP	$95-11%	$107
Performance per Dollar	18.1+14%	15.9
Release Date	2011	2018

Search A6-3600 on Amazon

Search Celeron 4305UE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.