Quadro FX 3600M vs GeForce Go 7300
Quadro FX 3600M
Popular choices:
GeForce Go 7300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3600M is positioned at rank 65 and the GeForce Go 7300 is on rank 121, so the Quadro FX 3600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3600M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce Go 7300 is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The GeForce Go 7300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 3600M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 3600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 798.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7300.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3600M | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+798.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-798.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 3600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3600M and GeForce Go 7300
Quadro FX 3600M
The Quadro FX 3600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 467 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce Go 7300
The GeForce Go 7300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3600M scores 467 versus the GeForce Go 7300's 52 — the Quadro FX 3600M leads by 798.1%. The Quadro FX 3600M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce Go 7300 uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7300). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7300).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3600M | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 467+798% | 52 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 384+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.7626 TFLOPS+23% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3600M | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3600M | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7300). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3600M | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10+11% | 9.0c |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 3600M) vs No (GeForce Go 7300). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7300).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3600M | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP2) | PureVideo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3600M draws 189W versus the GeForce Go 7300's 64W — a 98.8% difference. The GeForce Go 7300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3600M | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 64W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.5+213% | 0.8 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 3600M and GeForce Go 7300
