Quadro FX 3600M vs GeForce Go 7300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3600M vs GeForce Go 7300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3600M vs GeForce Go 7300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3600M

2008

Why buy it

✅852.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌195.3% higher power demand at 189W vs 64W.

GeForce Go 7300

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 64W instead of 189W, a 125W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3600M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 852.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 798.1% in PassMark G3D (467 vs 52), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 3600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 3600M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 3600M vs GeForce Go 7300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3600M

The Quadro FX 3600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 467 points. Launch price was $3,499.

GeForce Go 7300

The GeForce Go 7300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3600M scores 467 versus the GeForce Go 7300's 52 — the Quadro FX 3600M leads by 798.1%. The Quadro FX 3600M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce Go 7300 uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7300). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7300).

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	GeForce Go 7300
G3D Mark Score	467+798%	52
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.7626 TFLOPS+23%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7300 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3600M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	GeForce Go 7300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3600M and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7300.

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	GeForce Go 7300
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7300). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	GeForce Go 7300
DirectX	10+11%	9.0c
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	3.3+57%	2.1
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 3600M) vs No (GeForce Go 7300). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7300).

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	GeForce Go 7300
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP2)	PureVideo
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3600M draws 189W versus the GeForce Go 7300's 64W — a 98.8% difference. The GeForce Go 7300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.