Quadro FX 3600M vs Radeon R5 M320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3600M vs Radeon R5 M320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3600M vs Radeon R5 M320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3600M

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M320 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.

Radeon R5 M320

2015

Why buy it

✅11.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 M320 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (475 vs 467), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 3600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 M320 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M320 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3600M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3600M vs Radeon R5 M320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3600M

The Quadro FX 3600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 467 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon R5 M320

The Radeon R5 M320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 475 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3600M scores 467 and the Radeon R5 M320 reaches 475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3600M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R5 M320 uses GCN, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M320).

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Radeon R5 M320
G3D Mark Score	467	475+2%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	1024+327%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Radeon R5 M320
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3600M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M320.

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Radeon R5 M320
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3600M draws 189W versus the Radeon R5 M320's 75W — a 86.4% difference. The Radeon R5 M320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M320). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Radeon R5 M320
TDP	189W	75W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	2.5	6.3+152%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 M320 (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Radeon R5 M320
MSRP	—	$150
Codename	GT200B	Pitcairn
Release	November 11 2008	June 9 2015
Ranking	#815	#522

Search Quadro FX 3600M on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.