Quadro FX 3600M vs Radeon R5 M240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3600M vs Radeon R5 M240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3600M vs Radeon R5 M240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3600M

2008

Why buy it

✅51.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌530% higher power demand at 189W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 M240

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 189W, a 159W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3600M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 51.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 M240 instead at 473 vs 467, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 3600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 M240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3600M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3600M vs Radeon R5 M240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3600M

The Quadro FX 3600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 467 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon R5 M240

The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3600M scores 467 and the Radeon R5 M240 reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3600M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M240).

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Radeon R5 M240
G3D Mark Score	467	473+1%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	320+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS+39%	0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	80+300%	20
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Radeon R5 M240
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3600M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M240.

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Radeon R5 M240
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Radeon R5 M240
DirectX	10	12+20%
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 3600M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M240). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Radeon R5 M240
Encoder	None	VCE 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP2)	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3600M draws 189W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W — a 145.2% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Radeon R5 M240
TDP	189W	30W-84%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	2.5	15.8+532%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 M240 (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Radeon R5 M240
MSRP	—	$100
Codename	GT200B	Oland
Release	November 11 2008	October 8 2013
Ranking	#815	#911

Search Quadro FX 3600M on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.