G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 320 vs Quadro FX 3600M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 320 vs Quadro FX 3600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 320

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 189W, a 159W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 3600M

2008

Why buy it

✅6.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
❌530% higher power demand at 189W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3600M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 320 instead at 470 vs 467, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 320 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 320 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 3600M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 320 vs Quadro FX 3600M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 320

The GeForce GT 320 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 470 points. Launch price was $79.

Quadro FX 3600M

The Quadro FX 3600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 467 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 320 scores 470 and the Quadro FX 3600M reaches 467 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 320 is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 3600M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 320) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3600M). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3600M).

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Quadro FX 3600M
G3D Mark Score	470	467
Architecture	Pascal	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS+81%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 320 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3600M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Quadro FX 3600M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 320 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3600M carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 320 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3600M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 320) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 3600M) — the GeForce GT 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Quadro FX 3600M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 320) vs 10 (Quadro FX 3600M). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Quadro FX 3600M
DirectX	10.1	10
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 320) vs None (Quadro FX 3600M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs PureVideo HD (VP2). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 320) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3600M).

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Quadro FX 3600M
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP4)	PureVideo HD (VP2)
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 320 draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 3600M's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The GeForce GT 320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 320) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3600M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 175mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Quadro FX 3600M
TDP	30W-84%	189W
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	175mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-12%	85
Perf/Watt	15.7+528%	2.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 320 (2017 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Quadro FX 3600M
MSRP	$79	—
Codename	GP108	GT200B
Release	May 17 2017	November 11 2008
Ranking	#641	#815

Search GeForce GT 320 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 3600M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.