GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon R5 M320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon R5 M320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon R5 M320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 320

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 87.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.9 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M320 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 M320

2015

Why buy it

✅18.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
89.9% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 M320 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (475 vs 470), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 320 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 320 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $71 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 87.9% (5.9 vs 3.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R5 M320 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon R5 M320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 320

The GeForce GT 320 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 470 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon R5 M320

The Radeon R5 M320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 475 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 320 scores 470 and the Radeon R5 M320 reaches 475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 320 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R5 M320 uses GCN, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 320) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M320).

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon R5 M320
G3D Mark Score	470	475+1%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1024+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 320 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 M320 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon R5 M320
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 320 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M320 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 320 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M320.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon R5 M320
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 320 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 M320's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GT 320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 320) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M320). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon R5 M320
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	175mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	15.7+149%	6.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 320 came in at $79, while the Radeon R5 M320 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GT 320 was 47.3% cheaper ($71 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.9 (GeForce GT 320) vs 3.2 (Radeon R5 M320) — the GeForce GT 320 offers 84.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 320 (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon R5 M320
MSRP	$79-47%	$150
Performance per Dollar	5.9+84%	3.2
Codename	GP108	Pitcairn
Release	May 17 2017	June 9 2015
Ranking	#641	#522

Search GeForce GT 320 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.