GeForce GT 320
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
GeForce GT 320 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 320 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4670 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GT 320 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 320
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌17.9% HIGHER MSRP$79 MSRPvs$67 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $12 less on MSRP ($67 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.9 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 320 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GT 320
The GeForce GT 320 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 470 points. Launch price was $79.
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 463 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 320 scores 470 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 reaches 463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 320 is built on Pascal while the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 320) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4670).
| Feature | GeForce GT 320 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 470+2% | 463 |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS+28% | 0.88 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 160 KB+11% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 320 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 320 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320 and 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4670. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 320) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) — the GeForce GT 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 320 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 320) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 320 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 320) vs None (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 320) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670).
| Feature | GeForce GT 320 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 320 draws 30W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4670's 30W — a 0% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 320) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 175mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce GT 320 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 175mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 15.7+2% | 15.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 320 came in at $79, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 launched at $67. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 4670 was 15.2% cheaper ($12 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.9 (GeForce GT 320) vs 6.9 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 offers 16.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 320 (2017 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GT 320 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79 | $67-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.9 | 6.9+17% |
| Codename | GP108 | M98 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #641 | #927 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 320 and Mobility Radeon HD 4670
