GeForce GT 320 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce GT 320
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 320 is positioned at rank #201 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 320
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 320 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4221.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (8 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 320.
| Insight | GeForce GT 320 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4221.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4221.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 363% better value per dollar than the GeForce GT 320.
| Insight | GeForce GT 320 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+363%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 320 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce GT 320
The GeForce GT 320 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 470 points. Launch price was $79.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 320 scores 470 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 4221.7%. The GeForce GT 320 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 320) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 320 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 470 | 20,312+4222% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4864+1167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+1337% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1665 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 16 | 80+400% |
| TMUs | 24 | 152+533% |
| L1 Cache | 0.14 MB | 4.8 MB+3329% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 320 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 320 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 320) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 320 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 8 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 320) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 320 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+19% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 320) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 320) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GT 320 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 320 draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 147.8% difference. The GeForce GT 320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 320) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 175mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GT 320 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-85% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-58% | 600W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 175mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 15.7 | 101.6+547% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 320 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The GeForce GT 320 costs 89.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.7 (GeForce GT 320) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 361.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GT 320 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-80% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-89% | $280 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.7 | 72.5+362% |
| Codename | GP108 | GA104 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #641 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 320 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
