GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon HD 7550M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon HD 7550M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon HD 7550M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 320

2017

Why buy it

✅25.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 40W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 7550M

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 320 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 40W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 320 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 25.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (470 vs 465), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 320 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 320 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon HD 7550M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 320

The GeForce GT 320 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 470 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon HD 7550M

The Radeon HD 7550M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 465 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 320 scores 470 and the Radeon HD 7550M reaches 465 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 320 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 7550M uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 320) vs 640 (Radeon HD 7550M). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7550M).

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon HD 7550M
G3D Mark Score	470+1%	465
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS+30%	0.864 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	144 KB	160 KB+11%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 320 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7550M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon HD 7550M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320 and System on the Radeon HD 7550M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 320) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7550M) — the GeForce GT 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon HD 7550M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 320 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7550M's 40W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GT 320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 320) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7550M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon HD 7550M
TDP	30W-25%	40W
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	175mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	15.7+35%	11.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 320 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon HD 7550M
MSRP	$79	—
Codename	GP108	Heathrow
Release	May 17 2017	April 24 2012
Ranking	#641	#787

Search GeForce GT 320 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7550M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.