
GeForce 800M

GeForce GT 320
GeForce 800M vs GeForce GT 320 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 800M vs GeForce GT 320 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 800M vs GeForce GT 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 800M
2014Why buy it
- ✅1.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
GeForce GT 320
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 800M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 800M vs GeForce GT 320 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 800M
The GeForce 800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 477 points.

GeForce GT 320
The GeForce GT 320 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 470 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 800M scores 477 and the GeForce GT 320 reaches 470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 800M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 320 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 800M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 320). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 800M) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 800M | GeForce GT 320 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 477+1% | 470 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 1.127 TFLOPS+31% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1468 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 24+50% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+33% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 800M | GeForce GT 320 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 800M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 320 carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 320 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 800M and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 800M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 320) — the GeForce 800M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 800M | GeForce GT 320 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 800M) vs 10.1 (GeForce GT 320). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 800M | GeForce GT 320 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0+9% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.5+36% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 800M) vs None (GeForce GT 320). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD (VP4). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 800M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 320).
| Feature | GeForce 800M | GeForce GT 320 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | PureVideo HD (VP4) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 800M draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 320's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GT 320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 800M) vs 250W (GeForce GT 320). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 175mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce 800M | GeForce GT 320 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 30W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 0mm | 175mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 14.5 | 15.7+8% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GT 320 (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 800M | GeForce GT 320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $79 |
| Codename | GM108 | GP108 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #854 | #641 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














