GeForce 800M
VS
GeForce GT 625M

GeForce 800M vs GeForce GT 625M

NVIDIA

GeForce 800M

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 625M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 800M is positioned at rank 290 and the GeForce GT 625M is on rank 219, so the GeForce GT 625M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 800M

#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
97%
#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
94%
#280
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
683%
#282
619%
#283
617%
#287
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
561%
#288
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
558%
#290
GeForce 800M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#291
GeForce MX250
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#292
Radeon 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#293
GeForce MX330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
99%
#297
Radeon RX 780
MSRP: $499|Avg: $721
97%
#300
GeForce 940MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
#301
GeForce MX130
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
95%
#302
Arc Graphics 130V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
95%
#303
Radeon R5 430
MSRP: $59|Avg: $50
94%
#304
GeForce MX150
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 625M

#52
Radeon 8060S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
93%
#53
Radeon RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
89%
#209
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
448%
#211
406%
#212
405%
#216
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
368%
#217
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
366%
#219
GeForce GT 625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#221
Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
97%
#222
96%
#224
GeForce GT 640M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
94%
#228
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
MSRP: $149|Avg: $40
92%
#230
Maxwell GPU Surface Book
MSRP: $150|Avg: $75
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 625M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 800M.

InsightGeForce 800MGeForce GT 625M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 625M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 800M and GeForce GT 625M

NVIDIA

GeForce 800M

The GeForce 800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 477 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 625M

The GeForce GT 625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 485 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 800M scores 477 and the GeForce GT 625M reaches 485 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 800M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 625M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 800M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 625M). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 800M) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 625M). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 950 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 800MGeForce GT 625M
G3D Mark Score
477
485+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS+18%
0.7296 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1124 MHz+18%
950 MHz
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
16
32+100%
L1 Cache
192 KB+500%
32 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 800MGeForce GT 625M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 800M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 625M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 625M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 800M) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 625M) — the GeForce 800M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 800MGeForce GT 625M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 800M) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 625M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 800MGeForce GT 625M
DirectX
11.0
11.0
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
4.5+13%
4.0
Max Displays
1
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 800M) vs No (GeForce GT 625M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 800M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 625M).

FeatureGeForce 800MGeForce GT 625M
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 800M draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 625M's 45W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce 800M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 800M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 625M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 800MGeForce GT 625M
TDP
33W-27%
45W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
14.5+34%
10.8