Quadro FX 3600M
VS
Radeon HD 5570

Quadro FX 3600M vs Radeon HD 5570

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3600M

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5570

2009Core: 725 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3600M is positioned at rank 65 and the Radeon HD 5570 is on rank 201, so the Quadro FX 3600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3600M

#28
Quadro P5200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $240
100%
#29
Radeon PRO W7700
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
99%
#30
Radeon PRO W6600
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
99%
#32
Radeon AI PRO R9700
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450
94%
#33
Radeon Pro Vega 64
MSRP: $599|Avg: $114
92%
#50
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
633%
#65
Quadro FX 3600M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#69
Radeon Pro W5500
MSRP: $399|Avg: $300
96%
#72
Quadro P2200
MSRP: $429|Avg: $227
94%
#73
T1000
MSRP: $350|Avg: $382
94%
#74
Quadro P620
MSRP: $170|Avg: $48
93%
#78
Radeon Pro 570
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
90%
#80
T400
MSRP: $180|Avg: $179
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 5570

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1219%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1171%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1158%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1156%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1153%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1147%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1132%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1128%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1118%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1115%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1101%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1099%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1079%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1078%
#186
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1345%
#201
Radeon HD 5570
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
100%
#202
GeForce GT 320
MSRP: $79|Avg: $30
100%
#203
Radeon R5 A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#204
Radeon HD 7580D
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
98%
#205
Radeon HD 7470
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
97%
#206
Radeon R5 A240
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#207
Radeon HD 6550D
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
96%
#208
Radeon HD 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $67
96%
#209
Radeon R7 A360
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
95%
#210
Radeon R5 235X
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#211
Radeon HD 7290
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
94%
#212
Radeon HD 8210
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
94%
#213
Radeon HD 8330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
92%
#214
GeForce GT 520
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
92%
#215
GeForce GT 420
MSRP: $79|Avg: $79
92%
#216
Radeon HD4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $15
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 5570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 3600M.

InsightQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 5570
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Leading raw performance (+1.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 5570 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3600M and Radeon HD 5570

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3600M

The Quadro FX 3600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 467 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 5570

The Radeon HD 5570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 476 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3600M scores 467 and the Radeon HD 5570 reaches 476 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3600M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 5570 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 1,600 (Radeon HD 5570). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5570).

FeatureQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 5570
G3D Mark Score
467
476+2%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
1600 ×2+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
2.32 TFLOPS ×2+273%
ROPs
32
32 ×2
TMUs
80
80 ×2
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 5570
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3600M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5570 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 5570 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 5570) — the Radeon HD 5570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 5570
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 5570). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 5570
DirectX
10
11.2 (11_0)+12%
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
4.4+33%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 3600M) vs None (Radeon HD 5570). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 5570).

FeatureQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 5570
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP2)
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3600M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 5570's 294W — a 43.5% difference. The Quadro FX 3600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 250W (Radeon HD 5570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 70.

FeatureQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 5570
TDP
189W-36%
294W
Recommended PSU
350W
250W-29%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85
70-18%
Perf/Watt
2.5+56%
1.6
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 5570 is the newer GPU (2009 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 5570
MSRP
$80
Avg Price (30d)
$80
Codename
GT200B
Hemlock
Release
November 11 2008
November 18 2009
Ranking
#815
#651