Quadro FX 3600M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4670

CPU

GPU

Quadro FX 3600M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Mobility Radeon HD 4670

2009Core: 550 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro FX 3600M

189

467

+0.9%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

Mobility Radeon HD 4670

463

0.0%

Radeon HD 8280E

Radeon HD 2900 GT

Mobility Radeon HD 565v

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3600M is positioned at rank 65 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is on rank 418, so the Quadro FX 3600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3600M

#28

Quadro P5200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $240

100%

#29

Radeon PRO W7700

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

99%

#30

Radeon PRO W6600

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

99%

#32

Radeon AI PRO R9700

MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450

94%

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

92%

#50

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

633%

#65

Quadro FX 3600M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#69

Radeon Pro W5500

MSRP: $399|Avg: $300

96%

#72

Quadro P2200

MSRP: $429|Avg: $227

94%

#73

T1000

MSRP: $350|Avg: $382

94%

#74

Quadro P620

MSRP: $170|Avg: $48

93%

#78

Radeon Pro 570

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

90%

#80

T400

MSRP: $180|Avg: $179

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4670

#408

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1571%

#410

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1424%

#411

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1421%

#415

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1292%

#416

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1283%

#418

Mobility Radeon HD 4670

MSRP: $67|Avg: $20

100%

#419

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 8570 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

100%

#420

Radeon R9 M385

MSRP: $300|Avg: $60

99%

#421

Radeon R5 235

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

99%

#422

Radeon R9 M375X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

99%

#423

Radeon HD 6620G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

99%

#424

Radeon R5 310

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

98%

#425

Radeon HD 7690M XT

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

97%

#426

Radeon HD 7600G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

97%

#427

Radeon R7 A265

MSRP: $149|Avg: $149

97%

#428

Radeon R9 M470

MSRP: $350|Avg: $80

96%

#429

Radeon R9 M385X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

96%

#431

Mobility Radeon HD 5570

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

95%

#432

Radeon R5 M430

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

95%

#433

GeForce 810A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 3600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro FX 3600M	Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 3600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 3600M Benchmark Check

Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3600M and Mobility Radeon HD 4670

Quadro FX 3600M

The Quadro FX 3600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 467 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Mobility Radeon HD 4670

The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 463 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3600M scores 467 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 reaches 463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3600M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4670).

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Mobility Radeon HD 4670
G3D Mark Score	467	463
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	240	800+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.88 TFLOPS+41%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3600M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 has 1 GB. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Mobility Radeon HD 4670
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Mobility Radeon HD 4670
DirectX	10	10.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 3600M) vs None (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670).

Feature	Quadro FX 3600M	Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP2)	UVD 2.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3600M draws 189W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4670's 30W — a 145.2% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 70.