A6-3600 vs Xeon L5335

A6-3600 vs Xeon L5335 Performance Spectrum

A6-3600

4 / 4

1,718

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L5335

4 / 4

1,737

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-3600 vs Xeon L5335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-3600 vs Xeon L5335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-3600

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $285 less on MSRP ($95 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
✅Delivers 295.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 4.6 PassMark/$ ($95 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6530D, while Xeon L5335 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon L5335.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,718 vs 1,737).
❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.

Xeon L5335

2007

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.6 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($380 MSRP vs $95 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-3600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-3600.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-3600 better than Xeon L5335?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A6-3600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L5335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-3600 is the better buy right now. A6-3600 comes in $285 cheaper on MSRP at $95 MSRP versus $380 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon L5335 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better PassMark. It is also 295.6% better value on MSRP (18.1 vs 4.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-3600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-3600 vs Xeon L5335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-3600

The A6-3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,718 points. Launch price was $70.

Xeon L5335

The Xeon L5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 August 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,737 points. Launch price was $380.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-3600 and Xeon L5335 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-3600 versus 2 GHz on the Xeon L5335 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the A6-3600 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A6-3600 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon L5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3600 scores 1,718 against the Xeon L5335's 1,737 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon L5335. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3600 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L5335.

Feature	A6-3600	Xeon L5335
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+5%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	4 MB (total)+300%
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,718	1,737+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	253	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3600 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L5335 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A6-3600	Xeon L5335
Socket	FM1	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-3600) / not specified (Xeon L5335). The A6-3600 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6530D), while the Xeon L5335 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3600 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-3600 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	A6-3600	Xeon L5335
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6530D	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Budget Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A6-3600 was priced at $95, while the Xeon L5335 came in at $380. On launch pricing ($95 vs $380), A6-3600 was $285 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-3600 delivers 18.1 pts/$ vs 4.6 pts/$ for the Xeon L5335 — making the A6-3600 the 119.3% better value option.

Feature	A6-3600	Xeon L5335
MSRP	$95-75%	$380
Performance per Dollar	18.1+293%	4.6
Release Date	2011	2007

Search A6-3600 on Amazon

Search Xeon L5335 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.