A6-3600
VS
Xeon 5160

A6-3600 vs Xeon 5160

AMD

A6-3600

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Xeon 5160

2 Cores2 Thrd80 WWMax: 3 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-3600 is positioned at rank 613 and the Xeon 5160 is on rank 903, so the A6-3600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10888%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10288%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7470%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2250%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1783%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1559%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
893%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
881%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
803%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
803%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
794%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
772%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
761%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
758%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
751%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
99%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
98%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
97%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
97%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
100%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
100%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
100%
#617
Pentium G3250T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $30
99%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
99%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
99%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
99%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
98%
#624
Core i5-4590
MSRP: $192|Avg: $51
98%
#625
Celeron G440
MSRP: $37|Avg: $5
98%
#628
A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 5160

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
24222%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4573%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
4063%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3139%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
99%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
98%
#508
Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $65
97%
#509
EPYC 9684X
MSRP: $14756|Avg: $14756
96%
#509
EPYC 9754
MSRP: $11900|Avg: $10631
96%
#511
Xeon D-1587
MSRP: $1652|Avg: $1443
96%
#512
Xeon E5-2687W v4
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $1138
96%
#513
Xeon W-3265
MSRP: $3684|Avg: $3400
95%
#514
Xeon E5-2658A V3
MSRP: $1832|Avg: $200
95%
#515
Xeon E5-4640 v4
MSRP: $2837|Avg: N/A
93%
#903
Xeon 5160
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#906
Xeon E5405
MSRP: $209|Avg: $15
98%
#907
Xeon E5-2440
MSRP: $728|Avg: $249
98%
#916
Xeon E5-2650L
MSRP: $748|Avg: $129
94%
#918
Xeon E5410
MSRP: $256|Avg: $20
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 5160 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightA6-3600Xeon 5160
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Woodcrest (2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A6-3600 ($25), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($25 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightA6-3600Xeon 5160
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-3600 and Xeon 5160

AMD

A6-3600

The A6-3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,718 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Xeon 5160

The Xeon 5160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,715 points. Launch price was $22.

Processing Power

The A6-3600 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon 5160 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-3600 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon 5160 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 5160 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A6-3600 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon 5160 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3600 scores 1,718 against the Xeon 5160's 1,715 — a 0.2% lead for the A6-3600. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA6-3600Xeon 5160
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
3 GHz+25%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3 GHz+43%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
4 MB+300%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Woodcrest (2006)
PassMark
1,718
1,715
Geekbench 6 Single
253
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3600 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 5160 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA6-3600Xeon 5160
Socket
FM1
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-3600) / not specified (Xeon 5160). The A6-3600 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6530D), while the Xeon 5160 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3600 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-3600 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureA6-3600Xeon 5160
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6530D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Desktop