A6-3600 vs Core 2 Duo T7200
A6-3600
Core 2 Duo T7200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-3600 is positioned at rank 613 and the Core 2 Duo T7200 is on rank 29, so the Core 2 Duo T7200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A6-3600
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A6-3600 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) | ✅ More affordable ($6) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A6-3600 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+316%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) | ✅ More affordable ($6) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A6-3600 and Core 2 Duo T7200
A6-3600
The A6-3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,718 points. Launch price was $70.
Core 2 Duo T7200
The Core 2 Duo T7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,717 points. Launch price was $286.
Processing Power
The A6-3600 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T7200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-3600 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7200 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the A6-3600 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A6-3600 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7200 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3600 scores 1,718 against the Core 2 Duo T7200's 1,717 — a 0.1% lead for the A6-3600. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A6-3600 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+20% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+5% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,718 | 1,717 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 253 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A6-3600 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7200 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-3600 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7200 — the A6-3600 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A6-3600) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7200).
| Feature | A6-3600 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM1 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866+50% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3600) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7200). The A6-3600 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6530D), while the Core 2 Duo T7200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3600 targets Budget Desktop, Core 2 Duo T7200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-3600 rivals Pentium G630; Core 2 Duo T7200 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
| Feature | A6-3600 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6530D | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | Budget |
Value Analysis
The A6-3600 launched at $95 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo T7200 debuted at $286. At current prices ($25 vs $6), the Core 2 Duo T7200 is $19 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-3600 delivers 68.7 pts/$ vs 286.2 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T7200 — making the Core 2 Duo T7200 the 122.5% better value option.
| Feature | A6-3600 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $95-67% | $286 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $6-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.7 | 286.2+317% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6-3600 and Core 2 Duo T7200
