
A6-3600

Core 2 Duo T5750
A6-3600 vs Core 2 Duo T5750 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A6-3600 vs Core 2 Duo T5750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A6-3600 vs Core 2 Duo T5750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A6-3600
2011Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6530D, while Core 2 Duo T5750 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 2 Duo T5750.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (253 vs 360).
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,718 vs 1,738).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $95 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T5750 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
Core 2 Duo T5750
2008Why buy it
- ✅+42.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A6-3600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo T5750 better than A6-3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-3600 vs Core 2 Duo T5750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-3600
The A6-3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,718 points. Launch price was $70.

Core 2 Duo T5750
The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The A6-3600 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5750 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-3600 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the A6-3600 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A6-3600 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3600 scores 1,718 against the Core 2 Duo T5750's 1,738 — a 1.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5750. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 253 vs 360, a 34.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5750 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3600 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5750.
| Feature | A6-3600 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+20% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+5% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,718 | 1,738+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 253 | 360+42% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 680 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-3600 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-3600 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — the A6-3600 supports 179.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-3600 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-3600) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T5750) — the A6-3600 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A6-3600) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T5750).
| Feature | A6-3600 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM1 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866+180% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3600) vs None (Core 2 Duo T5750). The A6-3600 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6530D), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3600 targets Budget Desktop, Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-3600 rivals Pentium G630.
| Feature | A6-3600 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6530D | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | None |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | Legacy Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















